sydney: be called big smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents australia
Weight: 0.63
, new zealand
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.35
, western australia
Weight: 0.35
, perth
Weight: 0.35
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, usa
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called big smoke 1.00
be called smoke 0.96
be covered in smoke 0.88
is big 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(western australia, is big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(perth, be covered in smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(perth, be covered in smoke)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(western australia, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sydney, be called big smoke)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sydney, be called smoke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(sydney, be called smoke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(sydney, be called smoke)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called smoke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be covered in smoke)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sydney, be covered in smoke)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sydney, be covered in smoke)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sydney, be covered in smoke)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sydney, is big)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is big)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sydney, is big)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sydney, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sydney, be called big smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(perth, be covered in smoke)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be called big smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(western australia, is big)