system: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.72
, configuration
Weight: 0.65
, network device
Weight: 0.64
, free software
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hvac
Weight: 0.62
, transformer
Weight: 0.62
, terminal server
Weight: 0.61
, prism
Weight: 0.60
, radar
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
need system 0.85
has quality better 0.84
be called emotional-visceral system 0.84
be called system 0.84
has quality good 0.84
be different with system 0.83
is one way system 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
be considered system 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(system, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(system, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(system, has quality system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(system, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prism, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hvac, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(prism, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(system, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(system, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(system, has quality system)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(system, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(prism, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(prism, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hvac, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hvac, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(prism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(prism, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(system, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(system, be called emotional-visceral system)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(system, be called system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(system, be called system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(system, be considered system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(system, be considered system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(system, be called system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(system, be called system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(system, be considered system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(system, be considered system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(system, be called emotional-visceral system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(system, be called emotional-visceral system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(system, be called emotional-visceral system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(system, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hvac, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(prism, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(prism, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(system, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)