tab: be more expensive for newer cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents window
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, key
Weight: 0.56
Siblings window pane
Weight: 0.33
, rear window
Weight: 0.33
, folder
Weight: 0.32
, front door
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive for newer cars 1.00
be more expensive for cars 0.93
is expensive 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(window, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(window, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(front door, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(window, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(front door, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(front door, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tab, be more expensive for cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tab, be more expensive for cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tab, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for cars)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(front door, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(window, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tab, be more expensive for newer cars) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)