table saw: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents circular saw
Weight: 0.71
, saw
Weight: 0.71
, table
Weight: 0.64
, machine
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.38
, hash table
Weight: 0.37
, coffee table
Weight: 0.37
, dining table
Weight: 0.37
, miter saw
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
is complicated 0.78
be expensive in usa 0.76
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(table saw, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(machine, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(machine, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coffee table, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(table saw, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dining table, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coffee table, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(coffee table, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(table saw, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(table saw, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(machine, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coffee table, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(table saw, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(machine, is more efficient)