tablet: has quality use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality use 1.00
has quality good 0.88
has quality bad 0.86
has quality worth 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(market, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(market, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nokia, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tablet, has quality use)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tablet, has quality use)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tablet, has quality use)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tablet, has quality use)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tablet, has quality use)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(market, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tablet, has quality use)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nokia, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nokia, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nokia, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(tablet, has quality use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tablet, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(market, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nokia, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(nokia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality use)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(market, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(market, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tablet, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)