talking: is frowned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frowned 1.00
is frowned upon 0.91
is period frowned 0.90
is period frowned upon 0.85
is oneself frowned 0.81
is oneself frowned upon 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laughing, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laughing, is frowned)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(talking, is frowned)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(talking, is frowned upon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(talking, is period frowned upon)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(talking, is period frowned upon)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(talking, is period frowned upon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(talking, is period frowned upon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned upon)