target: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
set important in business 0.89
set important for business 0.89
affect business 0.89
be important in farm business 0.86
go out of business 0.84
affect businesses 0.81
be good company work for 0.80
be important for community 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(goal, set important for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(goal, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(factor, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(goal, be important in farm business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(goal, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(goal, be important in farm business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(goal, set important for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(factor, affect businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(goal, be important in farm business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(goal, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(goal, set important for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, be important for community)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(goal, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(goal, set important for business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(factor, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(goal, be important in farm business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(synagogue, be important for community)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(synagogue, be important for community)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(target, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(target, go out of business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(target, set important in business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(target, go out of business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(target, go out of business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(target, go out of business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, set important in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, set important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(target, be good company work for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, set important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(goal, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(goal, be important in farm business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(factor, affect businesses)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(goal, set important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(synagogue, be important for community)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(goal, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(goal, be important in farm business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(goal, set important for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(factor, affect businesses)