target: have starbucks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
have starbucks 1.00
shop at then walmart 0.78
shop at walmart 0.78
nyc 0.77
be better than walmart 0.77
be more expensive than walmart 0.76
is i d on iphone 0.75
is i d on new iphone 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(synagogue, nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(synagogue, nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(synagogue, nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(target, have starbucks)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(target, shop at then walmart)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(target, shop at then walmart)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(target, shop at then walmart)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(target, be better than walmart)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(target, be better than walmart)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(target, be more expensive than walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(target, have starbucks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(target, have starbucks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(target, have starbucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(synagogue, nyc)