target: shop at then walmart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
shop at then walmart 1.00
shop at walmart 0.99
be better than walmart 0.90
be more expensive than walmart 0.88
compete against walmart 0.85
have starbucks 0.78
be online cheaper than than store 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(target, shop at then walmart)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(target, have starbucks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(target, have starbucks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(target, compete against walmart)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(target, have starbucks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(target, have starbucks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, compete against walmart)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(target, be better than walmart)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(target, be better than walmart)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(target, compete against walmart)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(target, compete against walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(target, shop at then walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(target, shop at then walmart)