taste: is related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is related 1.00
be related 0.99
be related to number 0.85
be related to history 0.85
be related to area 0.85
get associated 0.82
be related to numbers 0.80
is linked 0.78
be related to concentration 0.78
be related to prime number 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(quality, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(quality, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be related)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to prime number)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(trait, be related)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(smell, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(smell, is related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(texture, be related to history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taste, is related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taste, is related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taste, is related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(quality, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taste, is related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taste, is related)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(smell, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(smell, is related)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(smell, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(smell, be related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(texture, be related to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(texture, be related to history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(taste, is related)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(taste, be related)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(taste, be related)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(taste, be related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(quality, be related)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(smell, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(smell, is related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(texture, be related to history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taste, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(quality, be related)
...