taxpayer: have subsidize

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.60
, citizen
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have subsidize 1.00
subsidize farmers 0.91
subsidize farmers ' insurance 0.89
subsidize rich farmers 0.89
subsidize discrimination 0.87
subsidize anti-gay discrimination 0.87
need pay 0.76
pay taxes 0.76
pay more 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(citizen, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(individual, pay taxes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(citizen, pay taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(individual, pay taxes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, pay taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(citizen, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(individual, pay taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(taxpayer, need pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(taxpayer, pay more)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(taxpayer, need pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, need pay)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay more)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, need pay)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay taxes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(citizen, pay taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(individual, pay taxes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(citizen, pay taxes)