taxpayer: subsidize discrimination

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.60
, citizen
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
subsidize discrimination 1.00
subsidize anti-gay discrimination 1.00
have subsidize 0.87
subsidize farmers 0.83
subsidize farmers ' insurance 0.83
subsidize rich farmers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)