taxpayer: subsidize rich farmers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.60
, citizen
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
subsidize rich farmers 1.00
subsidize farmers 0.97
subsidize farmers ' insurance 0.93
have subsidize 0.89
subsidize discrimination 0.81
subsidize anti-gay discrimination 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize farmers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(taxpayer, have subsidize)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize farmers ' insurance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize anti-gay discrimination)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize discrimination)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, have subsidize)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxpayer, subsidize rich farmers)