tea: be better than coffee

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings high tea
Weight: 0.59
, frappe
Weight: 0.39
, coffee
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.34
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than coffee 1.00
be more expensive than coffee 0.94
be cheaper than coffee 0.94
be healthier than coffee 0.92
be hotter than coffee 0.91
stay longer than coffee 0.91
seem hotter than coffee 0.89
be superior to coffee 0.89
lose heat quicker than coffee 0.89
be good alternative to coffee 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tea, be better than coffee)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tea, be good alternative to coffee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be better than coffee)