tea: be cheaper than coffee

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings high tea
Weight: 0.59
, frappe
Weight: 0.39
, coffee
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.34
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than coffee 1.00
be more expensive than coffee 0.96
be better than coffee 0.94
be healthier than coffee 0.89
be hotter than coffee 0.89
stay longer than coffee 0.88
be good alternative to coffee 0.88
seem hotter than coffee 0.87
lose heat quicker than coffee 0.86
be superior to coffee 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tea, be superior to coffee)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tea, be good alternative to coffee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)