technician: be called engineers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called engineers 1.00
hate engineers 0.95
call themselves engineers 0.92
be regarded as engineers 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(technician, be called engineers)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(technician, hate engineers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(technician, hate engineers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(technician, hate engineers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technician, hate engineers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(technician, be regarded as engineers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(technician, be called engineers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(technician, be called engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(technician, be called engineers)