technician: be regarded as engineers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as engineers 1.00
be called engineers 0.90
hate engineers 0.85
call themselves engineers 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(technician, hate engineers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(technician, be called engineers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(technician, hate engineers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(technician, hate engineers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(technician, be called engineers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(technician, be called engineers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technician, hate engineers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(technician, be called engineers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(technician, call themselves engineers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(technician, be regarded as engineers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers)