technician: call themselves engineers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
call themselves engineers 1.00
be called engineers 0.92
hate engineers 0.90
be regarded as engineers 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(technician, call themselves engineers)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(technician, hate engineers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(technician, hate engineers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(technician, hate engineers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(technician, be called engineers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technician, hate engineers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(technician, be called engineers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(technician, be called engineers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(technician, be regarded as engineers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(technician, be called engineers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(technician, be regarded as engineers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(technician, be regarded as engineers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(technician, be regarded as engineers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(technician, call themselves engineers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(technician, call themselves engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(technician, call themselves engineers)