technician: have wear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wear 1.00
wear ssg 0.98
need wear 0.94
wear suits 0.85
wear suits making 0.84
wear clean suits 0.82
wear bunny suits making 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nurse, have wear)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(technician, have wear)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(nurse, have wear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nurse, have wear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nurse, have wear)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(technician, have wear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(technician, have wear)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(technician, need wear)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear ssg)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(technician, need wear)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technician, need wear)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear suits making)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear suits)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(technician, wear ssg)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(technician, need wear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technician, wear ssg)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technician, wear ssg)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(technician, wear suits)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(technician, wear suits making)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(technician, wear suits)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(technician, wear suits making)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(technician, wear suits)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(technician, wear suits making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(technician, have wear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(technician, have wear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nurse, have wear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(technician, have wear)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nurse, have wear)