technician: wear clean suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear clean suits 1.00
wear suits 0.94
wear suits making 0.92
wear bunny suits making 0.88
wear ssg 0.82
have wear 0.82
need wear 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nurse, have wear)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(technician, wear clean suits)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(nurse, have wear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nurse, have wear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nurse, have wear)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(technician, wear clean suits)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(technician, wear suits)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(technician, wear suits)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(technician, wear suits making)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(technician, wear suits making)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(technician, wear suits)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(technician, wear suits making)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(technician, have wear)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(technician, need wear)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technician, wear ssg)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(technician, wear ssg)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(technician, have wear)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(technician, need wear)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(technician, have wear)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technician, wear ssg)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(technician, need wear)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear suits making)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear suits)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear ssg)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(technician, have wear)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technician, need wear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(technician, wear clean suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nurse, have wear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nurse, have wear)