technician: need wear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nurse
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
Siblings installer
Weight: 0.59
, supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, salesman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need wear 1.00
have wear 0.94
wear ssg 0.93
wear suits 0.82
wear suits making 0.81
wear clean suits 0.80
wear bunny suits making 0.77
prefer use 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nurse, have wear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(technician, need wear)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(nurse, have wear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nurse, have wear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(nurse, have wear)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(technician, need wear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(technician, need wear)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear ssg)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(technician, have wear)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear suits making)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear suits)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear clean suits)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(technician, prefer use)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(technician, wear ssg)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(technician, have wear)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(technician, have wear)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(technician, have wear)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(technician, prefer use)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technician, wear ssg)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(technician, prefer use)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(technician, wear suits)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technician, wear ssg)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(technician, prefer use)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(technician, wear suits making)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(technician, wear clean suits)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(technician, wear suits)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(technician, wear clean suits)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(technician, wear suits making)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technician, wear bunny suits making)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(technician, wear suits)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(technician, wear clean suits)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(technician, wear suits making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technician, need wear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(technician, need wear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nurse, have wear)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(technician, need wear)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nurse, have wear)