terrier: have long tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small dog
Weight: 0.69
, puppy
Weight: 0.61
, dog
Weight: 0.59
, breed
Weight: 0.55
, series
Weight: 0.48
Siblings shih tzu
Weight: 0.54
, jack russell
Weight: 0.53
, hound
Weight: 0.45
, westies
Weight: 0.43
, dachshund
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tongues 1.00
has physical part tongues 0.93
have short tails 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jack russell, have short tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(jack russell, have short tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(jack russell, have short tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(terrier, have long tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(terrier, has physical part tongues)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(terrier, have short tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(terrier, have short tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(terrier, have long tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jack russell, have short tails)