terrier: have short tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small dog
Weight: 0.69
, puppy
Weight: 0.61
, dog
Weight: 0.59
, breed
Weight: 0.55
, series
Weight: 0.48
Siblings shih tzu
Weight: 0.54
, jack russell
Weight: 0.53
, hound
Weight: 0.45
, westies
Weight: 0.43
, dachshund
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have short tails 1.00
has physical part tails 0.88
have long tongues 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(terrier, have short tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(jack russell, have short tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jack russell, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(terrier, have short tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(jack russell, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(jack russell, have short tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(jack russell, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(jack russell, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(terrier, have short tails)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(terrier, have long tongues)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(terrier, have long tongues)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(terrier, have long tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(terrier, have short tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(jack russell, have short tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(jack russell, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(terrier, have short tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)