terrier: has physical part tongues

Related concepts

Parents	small dog Weight: 0.69 , puppy Weight: 0.61 , dog Weight: 0.59 , breed Weight: 0.55 , series Weight: 0.48
Siblings	shih tzu Weight: 0.54 , jack russell Weight: 0.53 , hound Weight: 0.45 , westies Weight: 0.43 , dachshund Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part tongues	1.00
have long tongues	0.93
has physical part tails	0.80
has physical part whiskers	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(puppy, has physical part whiskers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(puppy, has physical part whiskers)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(puppy, has physical part whiskers)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(jack russell, has physical part tails)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(jack russell, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(puppy, has physical part whiskers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(jack russell, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(jack russell, has physical part tails)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(dachshund, has physical part whiskers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(jack russell, has physical part whiskers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(jack russell, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(terrier, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(terrier, has physical part whiskers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(terrier, has physical part whiskers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part whiskers)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part whiskers)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(terrier, have long tongues)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(terrier, have long tongues)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(terrier, have long tongues)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(terrier, have long tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part whiskers)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(jack russell, has physical part tails)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(jack russell, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(puppy, has physical part whiskers)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(terrier, has physical part tongues) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)