thalamus: CAN can compared to network computer server

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents limbic system
Weight: 0.60
, nervous system
Weight: 0.54
, area
Weight: 0.48
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.48
, brain
Weight: 0.48
Siblings hypothalamus
Weight: 0.36
, hippocampus
Weight: 0.35
, motor neuron
Weight: 0.33
, neurotransmitter
Weight: 0.33
, cerebral cortex
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
CAN can compared to network computer server 1.00
be like computer 0.84
CAN can compared 0.82
be called computer 0.82
be better than computer 0.82
be called human computer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(brain, be like computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(brain, be called computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(brain, be called computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(brain, be like computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brain, be better than computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brain, be like computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called computer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(brain, be like computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(brain, be called computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(thalamus, CAN can compared)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(brain, be like computer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brain, be called computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brain, be better than computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brain, be called human computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brain, be called human computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brain, be called computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(brain, be like computer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(thalamus, CAN can compared to network computer server) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brain, be better than computer)