theory: be more useful than laws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more useful than laws 1.00
is useful 0.79
be more important than facts 0.79
be more important than modern theories 0.78
be more important than theories 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(explanation, is useful)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(explanation, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(model, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(explanation, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(model, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(string theory, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(explanation, is useful)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(string theory, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(string theory, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(theory, be more useful than laws)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than facts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more important than theories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than facts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than facts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than facts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(theory, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than theories)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than theories)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(theory, be more important than modern theories)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than theories)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(theory, be more important than modern theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(explanation, is useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(model, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(string theory, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(explanation, is useful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(theory, be more useful than laws)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(model, is useful)