throwing: be illegal in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, sport
Weight: 0.48
, activity
Weight: 0.48
, motion
Weight: 0.48
, ball
Weight: 0.46
Siblings throw
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, pitching
Weight: 0.32
, hanging
Weight: 0.32
, running
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in california 1.00
be illegal in indiana 0.84
be illegal in canada 0.83
is illegal 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pitching, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pitching, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pitching, is illegal)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hanging, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hanging, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in california)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(throwing, is illegal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(throwing, is illegal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(throwing, is illegal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(throwing, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pitching, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hanging, is illegal)