throwing: be illegal in indiana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, sport
Weight: 0.48
, activity
Weight: 0.48
, motion
Weight: 0.48
, ball
Weight: 0.46
Siblings throw
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, pitching
Weight: 0.32
, hanging
Weight: 0.32
, running
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in indiana 1.00
be illegal in california 0.84
be illegal in canada 0.82
is illegal 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pitching, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pitching, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pitching, is illegal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hanging, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hanging, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(throwing, is illegal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(throwing, is illegal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(throwing, is illegal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(throwing, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pitching, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hanging, is illegal)