throwing: be illegal in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, sport
Weight: 0.48
, activity
Weight: 0.48
, motion
Weight: 0.48
, ball
Weight: 0.46
Siblings throw
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, pitching
Weight: 0.32
, hanging
Weight: 0.32
, running
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in canada 1.00
be illegal in california 0.83
be illegal in indiana 0.82
is illegal 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pitching, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hanging, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pitching, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pitching, is illegal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hanging, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hanging, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(throwing, be illegal in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(throwing, is illegal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(throwing, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(throwing, be illegal in indiana)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(throwing, is illegal)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(throwing, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(throwing, be illegal in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pitching, is illegal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(throwing, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hanging, is illegal)