tiger: be called big cats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called big cats 1.00
be called cats 0.95
is cats 0.92
look like cats 0.90
is good pets 0.85
is indanged animals 0.81
is animals 0.81
has state pets 0.81
be endagerd animals 0.81
be animals 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tiger, be called big cats)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tiger, be called big cats)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(lion, is cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tiger, be called big cats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lion, is cats)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(predator, is good pets)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lion, is cats)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(predator, is good pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tiger, be called big cats)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tiger, be called big cats)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(lion, is cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tiger, be called big cats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tiger shark, is animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(tiger, be called big cats)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tiger, is animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tiger, is animals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tiger, is animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tiger, be called big cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lion, is cats)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(predator, is good pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is animals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lion, is cats)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(predator, is good pets)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tiger, be called big cats) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)