tissue: be advantage to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.61
, paper towel
Weight: 0.56
, nucleic acid
Weight: 0.56
Siblings bone tissue
Weight: 0.82
, bone cell
Weight: 0.76
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.75
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.73
, muscle cell
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be advantage to plants 1.00
be in plants 0.85
be in plants important 0.83
be important in plants 0.83
be different in plants 0.83
be important to plants 0.83
survive than plants 0.81
be beneficial to plants 0.80
be present in plants 0.80
land plants 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, land plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(vascular tissue, land plants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, land plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tissue, be different in plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tissue, be different in plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tissue, be in plants important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tissue, be important in plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tissue, be important to plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tissue, be different in plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tissue, be present in plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tissue, be in plants important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important in plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tissue, be in plants important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important to plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be in plants important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important in plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be different in plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important to plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tissue, be important in plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be present in plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tissue, be present in plants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tissue, be present in plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be advantage to plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, land plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be advantage to plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be advantage to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important in plants)