titanium: be poor conductor of thermal heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
, aluminum
Weight: 0.64
, alloy
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, steel
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.36
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.35
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be poor conductor of thermal heat 1.00
be poor conductor of heat 0.92
be poor conductor of electricity 0.86
be good conductor of electricity 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of heat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of electricity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(titanium, be poor conductor of electricity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of electricity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(titanium, be poor conductor of heat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of heat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of electricity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(steel, be poor conductor of heat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(titanium, be poor conductor of thermal heat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)