tone: be barrier to communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings speech
Weight: 0.64
, white
Weight: 0.60
, tan
Weight: 0.47
, theme
Weight: 0.33
, style
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be barrier to communication 1.00
be important in communication 0.82
affect communication 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tone, be barrier to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tone, affect communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tone, affect communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tone, affect communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tone, be important in communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tone, be important in communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tone, affect communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)