speech: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
affect communication 0.93
be primary mode of communication 0.83
be barrier to communication 0.82
be different in communicating 0.80
be important in macbeth 0.78
be important in othello 0.78
communicating online 0.77
be easiest modality for communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tone, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tone, be different in communicating)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tone, affect communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tone, be different in communicating)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tone, communicating online)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tone, communicating online)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in communication)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tone, be different in communicating)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tone, affect communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, be important in othello)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tone, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tone, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, be barrier to communication)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tone, communicating online)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tone, be different in communicating)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(soliloquy, be important in othello)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, be important in othello)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(speech, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(speech, be primary mode of communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(speech, be primary mode of communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(speech, be easiest modality for communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(speech, be primary mode of communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(speech, be easiest modality for communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(speech, be primary mode of communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(speech, be easiest modality for communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(speech, be easiest modality for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tone, affect communication)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tone, be different in communicating)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tone, be important in communication)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tone, communicating online)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(soliloquy, be important in othello)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tone, affect communication)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tone, be different in communicating)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tone, be important in communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tone, be barrier to communication)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tone, communicating online)