tool: was important to early humans

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.65 , gift Weight: 0.62 , mechanism Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.61
Siblings	metaphor Weight: 0.71 , task force Weight: 0.69 , spreadsheet Weight: 0.69 , free software Weight: 0.69 , calculator Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was important to early humans	1.00
was important to humans	0.94
be important to humans	0.91
were helpful to early people	0.82
be important for human being	0.81
be important for human beings	0.79
be important to people	0.78
were important to hunters-gatherers	0.78
be important to organisation	0.77
be important for beings	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(resource, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(resource, be important for human being) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(resource, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(resource, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(resource, be important to humans)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(resource, be important for human being)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(resource, be important to people)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(resource, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to humans)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for human being)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to people)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(resource, be important to humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tool, was important to early humans)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(resource, be important for human being) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tool, was important to early humans)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(resource, be important to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tool, was important to early humans)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(resource, be important to organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tool, was important to early humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(tool, was important to early humans)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(tool, was important to humans)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(tool, was important to humans)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(tool, was important to humans)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to humans)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, was important to early humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(resource, be important for human being)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(resource, be important to people)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(tool, was important to early humans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(resource, be important to organisation)