toronto: be colder than vancouver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.57
, event
Weight: 0.56
, canada
Weight: 0.56
, city
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.66
, ontario
Weight: 0.56
, montreal
Weight: 0.36
, quebec city
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colder than vancouver 1.00
be better than vancouver 0.92
be compared to vancouver 0.86
be better than montreal 0.80
is toronto 0.76
be called toronto good 0.75
is pronounced toronto 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be compared to vancouver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(toronto, be better than vancouver)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(toronto, be compared to vancouver)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be called toronto good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(toronto, be compared to vancouver)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(toronto, be better than montreal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is pronounced toronto)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(toronto, be called toronto good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(toronto, be called toronto good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(toronto, be called toronto good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(toronto, be compared to vancouver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be colder than vancouver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(toronto, be colder than vancouver)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(toronto, be colder than vancouver)