traffic light: be horizontal in texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.83
, light
Weight: 0.76
, intersection
Weight: 0.70
, signal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.78
, traffic jam
Weight: 0.41
, light source
Weight: 0.38
, light bulb
Weight: 0.38
, black light
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be horizontal in texas 1.00
be horizontal in florida 0.92
be in texas 0.90
is horizontal 0.88
be horizontal in calgary 0.88
be in sideways texas 0.86
be vertical in ontario 0.79
be in vertical configuration in ontario 0.79
is vertical 0.76
be in sideways florida 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in sideways texas)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in sideways texas)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in sideways texas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in sideways florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in sideways florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in sideways florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in calgary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in sideways texas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in sideways florida)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(traffic light, is vertical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)