traffic light: is vertical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents traffic
Weight: 0.83
, light
Weight: 0.76
, intersection
Weight: 0.70
, signal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red light
Weight: 0.78
, traffic jam
Weight: 0.41
, light source
Weight: 0.38
, light bulb
Weight: 0.38
, black light
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vertical 1.00
be in vertical configuration 0.90
be vertical in ontario 0.85
be in vertical configuration in ontario 0.85
is horizontal 0.84
be in christmas tree vertical configuration 0.82
be horizontal in texas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(traffic light, is vertical)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in vertical configuration in ontario)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(traffic light, be vertical in ontario)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(traffic light, be in christmas tree vertical configuration)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be in vertical configuration)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, is horizontal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(traffic light, be horizontal in texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, is vertical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(traffic light, is vertical)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(traffic light, is vertical)