traffic: be heavy in cities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.61
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, stop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.83
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, air pollution
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be heavy in cities 1.00
is heavy 0.85
be heavy today 0.84
be problem in cities 0.83
be higher in urban areas 0.79
be in city 0.76
be bad in city 0.76
be bad in galway city 0.76
be higher in areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be in city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(air pollution, be in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be in city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be heavy today)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(traffic, be heavy today)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(traffic, is heavy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(traffic, be heavy today)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(traffic, be in city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(traffic, is heavy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(traffic, be bad in city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be bad in city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(traffic, be in city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(traffic, be in city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(traffic, be problem in cities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(traffic, is heavy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(traffic, be bad in city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(traffic, be bad in city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be in city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(traffic, be heavy today)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(traffic, is heavy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(traffic, be heavy in cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(traffic, be heavy in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(air pollution, be in city)