training: was at lackland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents preparation
Weight: 0.68
, equipment
Weight: 0.64
, field
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, exercise
Weight: 0.61
Siblings learning
Weight: 0.58
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.33
, fitness
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was at lackland 1.00
be in organisation 0.81
be for organisation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(training, was at lackland)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(training, be in organisation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(training, be in organisation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(training, be for organisation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(training, be in organisation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(training, be for organisation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(training, be for organisation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(training, be for organisation)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(training, be in organisation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(training, was at lackland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(training, was at lackland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(training, was at lackland)