transport: be in state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
Siblings active transport
Weight: 0.76
, ferry
Weight: 0.56
, lorry
Weight: 0.44
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in state 1.00
has state licence 0.93
has state case 0.80
benefit state 0.79
has state problem 0.79
has state jobs 0.78
has state complex 0.78
has state name 0.77
be in pietermaritzburg 0.77
be in sc2 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(transport, be in state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(option, be in sc2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(transport, be in state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(transport, be in state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(industry, benefit state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(transport, be in state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(industry, benefit state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(domain, has state case)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(option, be in sc2)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(domain, has state name)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, benefit state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state case)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(option, be in sc2)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(domain, has state name)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ferry, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lorry, has state licence)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(active transport, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(domain, has state case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(transport, be in state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(industry, benefit state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(transport, be in state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(domain, has state name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(transport, be in state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(option, be in sc2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(transport, be in state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ferry, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ferry, has state jobs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lorry, has state licence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lorry, has state licence)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(active transport, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(active transport, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(transport, be in state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(transport, be in state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(industry, benefit state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(domain, has state case)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(domain, has state name)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(option, be in sc2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ferry, has state jobs)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(active transport, has state jobs)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lorry, has state licence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(industry, benefit state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(domain, has state case)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(domain, has state name)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(transport, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(option, be in sc2)