trash: be at state park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, litter
Weight: 0.34
, waste
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state park 1.00
be at park 0.91
be at park lot 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash can, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at state park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at state park)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash can, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at state park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at state park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(litter, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(litter, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(trash, be at state park)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(trash, be at park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trash, be at park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(trash, be at park lot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash can, be at state park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(litter, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash can, be at state park)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(trash, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)