trend: analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cloud
Weight: 0.60
, convergence
Weight: 0.60
, denim
Weight: 0.57
, pattern
Weight: 0.35
, decline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
analysis 1.00
is analysis 1.00
analysis of is ratios 0.85
analysis of is ratios important 0.84
analysis of is financial ratios 0.83
analysis of is financial ratios important 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, analysis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, analysis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(policy, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, analysis)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(policy, analysis)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(factor, analysis)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, analysis)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(factor, analysis)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(policy, analysis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(policy, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(trend, analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(trend, is analysis)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, is analysis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, analysis)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(item, analysis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, analysis)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(trend, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(item, analysis)