tuesday: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thursday
Weight: 0.68
, friday
Weight: 0.60
, night
Weight: 0.60
, day
Weight: 0.59
, meeting
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rosh hashanah
Weight: 0.49
, wednesday
Weight: 0.38
, monday
Weight: 0.36
, saturday
Weight: 0.35
, black friday
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality standard 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(friday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(thursday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(friday, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(day, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(day, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(friday, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(thursday, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(friday, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(friday, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(thursday, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(friday, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(day, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(monday, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monday, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wednesday, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rosh hashanah, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(friday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(thursday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(day, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(friday, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(day, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wednesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wednesday, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rosh hashanah, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rosh hashanah, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(monday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(monday, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(monday, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(monday, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tuesday, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tuesday, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tuesday, has quality standard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality standard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tuesday, has quality standard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality standard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tuesday, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(friday, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(thursday, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(friday, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wednesday, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(monday, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monday, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rosh hashanah, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(day, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(day, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(thursday, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(friday, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tuesday, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(friday, has quality bad)