meeting: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.70
, topic
Weight: 0.66
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hearing
Weight: 0.67
, gathering
Weight: 0.67
, visit
Weight: 0.64
, encounter
Weight: 0.63
, retreat
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
have bad reputation 0.81
has quality loss 0.79
CAN good 0.78
is uis bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, is uis bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uis bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(encounter, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(encounter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(encounter, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(retreat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hearing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hearing, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality loss)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(meeting, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(meeting, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(encounter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality loss)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)