meeting: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.70
, topic
Weight: 0.66
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hearing
Weight: 0.67
, gathering
Weight: 0.67
, visit
Weight: 0.64
, encounter
Weight: 0.63
, retreat
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
has quality bad 0.81
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(demonstration, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hearing, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(encounter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retreat, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(demonstration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(demonstration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(retreat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(encounter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(encounter, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(retreat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(retreat, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hearing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hearing, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(meeting, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meeting, have reputation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(meeting, have reputation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(meeting, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(meeting, have reputation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have reputation)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(meeting, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(encounter, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hearing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(retreat, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demonstration, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)