forum: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.69
, discussion
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.66
, platform
Weight: 0.64
, meeting
Weight: 0.63
Siblings chat room
Weight: 0.69
, twitter
Weight: 0.64
, debate
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.61
, seminar
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worth 0.82
have bad reputation 0.81
CAN good 0.78
ruin quality 0.78
is terrible now 0.77
is uis bad 0.77
ruin video quality 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(debate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(twitter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chat room, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(seminar, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(forum, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(forum, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(forum, is uis bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, is uis bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uis bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(debate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)