chat room: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.69
, web site
Weight: 0.67
, chat
Weight: 0.64
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings irc
Weight: 0.60
, icq
Weight: 0.44
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34
, twitter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
has quality standard 0.81
ruin quality 0.78
is terrible now 0.77
is uis bad 0.77
ruin video quality 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chat, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chat, has quality standard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, is uis bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uis bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chat, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chat, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(twitter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(web, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chat room, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(chat room, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chat room, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chat room, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chat, has quality standard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chat, has quality standard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(chat room, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)