seminar: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, training
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.62
, experience
Weight: 0.62
Siblings conference
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.36
, lecture
Weight: 0.35
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, exposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worth 0.82
have bad reputation 0.81
CAN good 0.78
has quality difference 0.77
is uis bad 0.77
has quality questions 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(training, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(training, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(training, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(exposition, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uis bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(training, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lecture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(meeting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lecture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(conference, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(exposition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(exposition, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lecture, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lecture, has quality definition)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(conference, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality definition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meeting, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, is uis bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality questions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality definition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality questions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality worth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality definition)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality questions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(seminar, has quality definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality definition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(training, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(exposition, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lecture, has quality definition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(conference, has quality definition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(meeting, have bad reputation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(training, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)