conference: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.69
, seminar
Weight: 0.64
, function
Weight: 0.62
, gathering
Weight: 0.61
Siblings national convention
Weight: 0.65
, summit
Weight: 0.61
, pass
Weight: 0.56
, acc
Weight: 0.56
, chi
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better than yugioh 0.86
has quality wrong 0.83
has quality worth 0.83
has quality difference 0.81
was good 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gathering, be better than yugioh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(seminar, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(seminar, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gathering, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(seminar, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(gathering, has quality worth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(seminar, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chi, was good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(seminar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(seminar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(gathering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(gathering, be better than yugioh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gathering, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(seminar, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(gathering, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(seminar, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chi, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chi, was good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(conference, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(conference, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conference, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conference, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conference, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality worth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality questions)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chi, was good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(gathering, has quality wrong)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gathering, be better than yugioh)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seminar, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(conference, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)